One of the books I read recently
was the DSC award winner for 2016, Anuradha Roy’s “Sleeping on Jupiter”. Former DSC award winners include Shehan
Karunatilaka’s Chinaman and Jhumpa Lahiri’s The Lowland. Complimented by
it being a long list nominee of the Man
Booker, I felt that it could be a worthy read, thus my choosing it to read.
Upon completing it, I must confess that the
resulting feelings are somewhat a mixed bag. But I suspect that my judgement is somewhat prejudiced, in what the
traditionalist within me would expect out of a book. True that it is written
in beautiful language. True that it has so many strands of intrigue
simultaneously kept alive, and that they are interwoven adequately, if at a time predictably, to make the book quite a
page turner. Yet, considerable strands
remain loose ends by the time I finished reading the last page. Thus, what we
encounter is experiences of a half a dozen or more people, over ten days or so
; plus glimpses into past. Nomi who is trying to come to terms with her life,
torn apart early in life due to political violence and abuse at a Hindu Ashram
where she’s brought to seek refuge; The
ladies in their sixties (Vidya, Latika, Gauri ), past their days of responsibilities as mothers, but each
encountering their own battles – Dementia, dead husbands, unfaithful husbands,
bygone successes, bygone affairs ; the young man Badal living a hard life after his
father’s death, and whose main immediate goal in life is to win over a young
man whom he desires; the middle aged man, Suraj the professional cameraman, his life
in total disarray, trying hard to find a path of sanity. Amongst these many
characters what is abundant is the essential quality of restlessness, that of
each fighting their battles, the sense of insecurity and isolation that pervades most people in modern times. I
felt that it is these feelings that Roy wanted to emphasize and draw attention
to. It is this life within life that they seek while they go through the
motions of their daily lives. Within these 250 or so pages, it is these
characters, all with a past, all journeymen, all unsure what tomorrow will
bring them or where they want to go with their lives. The experiences of these
people certainly have the grains for a wonderful novel with an interesting plot
– yet, that mayn’t have been the authoresses’ reckoning. Thus my verdict (if I
may use such a strong term) to identify this book as one with many loose ends, which never gets tied
up. For example how the crimes that took
place at the Ashram were exposed, other than the possible role that Nomi played to expose it – that itself is not a fact, for it is unlikely that the
revelations by a helpless girl will bring to law the highly connected and the
influential priests, sadhus and monks. Another example is the fate of Gauri - what happens to her. May be it is the authoresses way of arguing for a continuation of chaos in the lives of these characters.
Hence it is but a traditional reader,
expecting a near complete story, with his innate prejudices about a story line
reaching a reasonable completion, who is left somewhat out in the cold as the
book ends. He calls it a “good-to-very good book” ( three and a half stars ),
where a more educated or more modern reader may call it a very good book awarding it four stars. It is in this particular
sense that I would appreciate the responses about this book, by those who have read this already
and those who plan to read it. To those who plan to read I can guarantee that
this book is indeed an intriguing one – albeit an incomplete one – but then
maybe that’s my prejudice at play. Tell you what ? Read it and tell me whether
I am. To paraphrase the title of a classic George Michael album – “Read without
Prejudice” , and tell me about the book, and that will tell me something about
my prejudices about what I expect from a book.
No comments:
Post a Comment